Thursday, November 18, 2010

Putting it to Use

This is kind of old but interesting nonetheless.  Researchers used chemical signatures (in this case isotopes) in the otoliths of bluefin tuna  to distinguish between fish spawned in the Mediterranean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico.  Clearly with the state of bluefin tuna populations, gathering information about life history is essential and otoliths can provide this information.  As I've written previously, it is difficult/improbable to capture and tag larvae and juveniles therefore the natural tags in otoliths are often the only record or natal origins available.      

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Perspectives

Willy Phillips is the commercial fisherman that I have been working with to conduct my research this summer.  He has been integral in helping me formulate ideas about how to conduct my work.  Willy has been working on the Albemarle Sound for years, and in addition to fishing has worked on a number of research projects.  During his time on the Albemarle, he has witnessed many changes and trends in the system.  Often times Willy and I have discussed observations I have made in the field, like low oxygen or high salinity events, and he was able to give me reasons for why these things were happening.  

This local ecological knowledge is the perfect starting point for many research projects and is important for researchers to consider. Often times, commercial fishermen are considered to be rather "shallow" and to only care about what fish they can harvest.  This is far from the truth, because they depend on fishing for their livelihood, they have an intimate understanding of the resource and care deeply about protecting it.  In this video Willy discusses the plight on commercial fishermen in North Carolina.   

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Justification

A quick view of the website for the Herring Alliance gives the impression that the biggest issue impeding the recovery of river herring stocks is by catch from the Atlantic herring fishery.  While there are certainly other factors contributing to the consistently low levels of river herring, including habitat loss and direct commercial catches, there is no doubt that by catch is a major factor.  The dilemma that occurs when attempting to restrict or manage river herring by catch is that so little is known about their marine migrations. 

Enter otolith microchemistry.

I have already written, and it has been well documented in the literature, about the ability of otoliths to record the natal origins of fish.  Theoretically, as long as there is data about the elemental signature of individual watersheds, river herring caught in the open ocean could be classified to natal rivers.  Knowing the natal origins of a fish captured in the open ocean is an incredible piece of information but is incredibly difficult to obtain.  Traditional tagging studies, where the fish is physically given some type of mark or tag, are difficult because of the large sample size, and amount of effort that is needed to carry out these studies.  Capturing small juvenile fish, while they are still in their natal area, and marking them is pretty much a death sentence and in most instances probably not practical.  The most effective larval/juvenile tagging studies utilize hatchery raised fish that have been marked with fin clips or been given chemical marks on their otoliths.  However, marking and recapturing hatchery-raised fish gives us no information about the behaviors of wild spawned fish.    

Knowing the natal origins of ocean caught fish (combined with age data also obtained from otoliths)  can provide valuable information about migration patterns, schooling behavior, stock structure, recruitment, and exploitation rates.  This data can then be used to strengthen management decisions.  As research on elemental signatures in otoliths continues to progress networks of signatures for rivers along the east coast can be built up so that some of these questions can be answered.    

Monday, November 8, 2010

Reflections On The Field Season That Was...

My field season has now been over for about 2 weeks, and I now feel as though I have had adequate time to reflect and evaluate myself on the good, bad and ugly that was my 2010 field season.  First, I should provide a little background information on why exactly I was in the field in the first place.  If you have read previous posts you know that I did a fair amount of water sampling throughout the summer (yes I know collecting bottles of water is just about as exciting as it gets).  However, this was not my only objective this summer, I was also attempting (emphasize attempting) to conduct a caging experiment using river herring to validate otolith elemental signatures from individual watersheds. 

My field work officially started in June, collecting my first water samples of the season.  I'll just get this out of the way now and say that I collected water samples from June-October and unless something interesting happened with regards to those trips (which nothing did that hasn't been mentioned in previous posts) I won't bring them up.  My first trip went surprisingly smooth...I think, it was along time ago and I was incredibly vague when I wrote it in my log.  The caging experiment portion of my field season was also supposed to start in June.  We had ordered a number of cages from Seagear and were set to deploy them in June.  However, on April 20, 2010 oil started leaking into the Gulf of Mexico, and the ensuing effort directed toward the Gulf of Mexico pretty much consumed the time Seagear had allotted toward building cages for me.  Now, I absolutely do not want to sound like I am complaining Seagear handled the situation extremely professionally, and losing a portion of my research is in no way on the same level as what was lost by residents of the gulf coast as a result of this spill.

July rolled around and I regrouped.  I threw together a couple of cages with parts from an experiment done a few years prior to mine and deployed them in July.  With cages in the water, I was feeling pretty good, all I needed was some fish.  Unfortunately, this is easier said than done.  Our goal was to catch juvenile river herring with a seine and plant them in cages however, it's no secret that juvenile river herring aren't particularly abundant, or easy to keep alive, as they have a tendency to die if you look at them the wrong way or make loud noises.    Our first seining expedition took place in the Roanoke River.    
We initially tried seining in downriver areas with a lot of vegetation.  However, the Roanoke River in this area is quite deep and the bottom is covered in about 1 meter of mud, not exactly the best seining location.  Regardless, we pulled a bunch of seines, and despite catching a lot of fish there were no herring.  We decided to move upstream, to a more favorable area. 
The water here was more shallow with less mud covering the bottom, and immediately we had success!  We caught two very small juvenile blueback herring.  My heart was pounding when I saw them in the net it was probably the most excited I had been in a while (to be honest I really wasn't expecting to catch anything so these fish were pretty breathtaking).  We brought the fish aboard the boat and it was a race against time to get the fish into the cage.  Unfortunately, one of the fish died in transport (not a huge deal it's otoliths are still valuable), but the other one lived and was successfully added to the cage!  I was pretty high on life after this trip, and was hoping this would set the tone for the rest of the field season.  Two weeks later we attempted to recover the fish we had put in the cage and it had mysteriously vanished.  Throughout the season we caught and added about 5 more fish to the cage in the Roanoke River, always with the same result, the fish would disappear, I will elaborate on this more later. 

Despite having a more favorable seining location in the Scuppernong River (shallow, sandy bottom with no stumps) we were never particularly successful in adding fish to this cage.  We caught flounder, lady fish, three trillion menhadden, and two 15 inch striped bass.  In total we caught one juvenile river herring, this one in fact:
This little guy was added to the cage, but met the same fate as the fish from the Roanoke River, mysteriously vanishing. 

The Alligator River presented the greatest challenge when it came to seining, not only because it is very deep and the bottom is covered by stumps and mud but mostly because I am slightly terrified of bull sharks and alligators. 
boat launch at the Alligator River

Now, I never saw either of these animals in the river, and there is basically zero chance of being attacked but it's something that hung in the back of my mind every time we were there.  The only site we could effectively seine was a downriver section of the river.  Seining here was pretty interesting because of the diversity of fish we caught, we pulled in everything from juvenile bluefish and some kind of mackerel (or jack) to an adult hickory shad who had apparently forgotten that she was supposed to be in the Atlantic Ocean.  We only caught one juvenile river herring, that never got added to a cage, however given the circumstances I consider this to be a small success. 

By far the river where we had the most success was the Chowan River.  We never failed to catch river herring here and when we caught them we usually caught pretty decent numbers.  I was pretty confident about this river from the very start, part of the river has sandy shores which are perfect for seining, and we caught close to 80 river herring in our very first seine.


We were even able to add most of these fish to the cage
Things in the Chowan River usually went pretty smooth, despite the fact that all of the fish added to the cage vanished.  Also, I wouldn't be doing this post justice if I didn't mention the boat running out of gas about two miles from the boat launch and having to swim/push/pull the boat into shore.
Not one of our more proud moments but it could have been worse. 

To address the issue of vanishing fish we hypothesized a few possible causes.  The first was they were escaping through holes in the cage.  This was possible but unlikely because there really weren't large holes in the cages, and if we found new holes throughout the season we closed them.  Another potential cause was predation.  Again this was unlikely as a predator would have to get into the cage, and if it was a very small predator I don't think the whole fish would be devoured so quickly.  I think the most likely scenario involved the fish dieing from stress or low oxygen and decaying quickly in the high water temperatures.  Towards the end of the season when the water temperatures were slightly cooler we found portions of the fish in the cage, which somewhat supports this hypothesis.  In the future, I really think the only way to do an experiment like this would be to do it in the lab which unfortunately doesn't allow you to directly validate the elemental signature from a watershed, but can be used to gauge how elements are incorporated into the otolith.     

Looking back if I had to choose one word to describe the field season it would have to be "mediocre".  For everything that went right something else would go wrong.  We did get a lot of data and were incredibly successful overall in capturing juvenile river herring.  We were even pretty successful in keeping the fish alive during transport, which is no easy task.  This was the first time I had really been in charge of planning field work and I learned a lot from the experience.  I have certain strengths when it comes to field work but I also have weaknesses.  At times I was poorly organized and under prepared, but I do think I learned and improved as the season went on. 

I definitely have to thank the people who helped me out with field work throughout the season: Coley, Chuck, Jeff, and especially Joey Smith.  Joey was the undergrad who worked in the field with me and was there for every trip, I thank him for the knowledge he brought about the Albemarle watershed and his commitment to the project.